Moscow x Detroit Symposium in the books

The Moscow x Detroit Symposium at the University of Michigan (October 11-12, 2019), co-organized by Claire Zimmerman, Jean-Louis Cohen, and me, was a resounding success! As one participant noted afterward, it was a “ tremendously stimulating” gathering that brought together “people of different but related orientations and encouraged them to step outside of their conventional comfort zones.” Technological exchanges between the US and USSR in the late 1920s and early 1930s were analyzed by the speakers through architecture, memoirs, films, and personal correspondence back and forth over the Atlantic Ocean. The best host gift: Soviet era Chelyabinsk Tractor Factory commemorative aluminum pins from Russian scholar, Evgeniia Konysheva.

The entire schedule of the event, overview, etc can be found beneath the photo gallery.

MOSCOW x DETROIT: Transnational Modernity in the Built Environment

October 11th, 2019 @ UMMA

KEYNOTE: "Americanized Bolshevism and its New New Worlds” - Jean Louis Cohen | Institute of Fine Arts, NYU

October 12, 2019 @ Rackham Amphitheatre

9:00-11:00 Session I: SURVEYING

1. “’Improve the Roads’: Valerian Osinsky, the American Automobile, and the Campaign to Overcome Russian Roadlessness in the 1920s-30s,” Lewis Siegelbaum, Michigan State University
2. “The Art of the Standard: Andrei Burov discovers America,” Richard Anderson, Edinburgh University
3. “Foreign Specialists in Soviet Industry in the 1920 and1930s: Forgotten History or Soviet Ideology? The case of Eastern Ukraine,” Oksana Chabanyuk, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture
4. “A Monument to the First Five-Year Plan: Moscow’s Palace of Soviets and the Afterlife of Amerikanizm through the 1930s,” Katherine Zubovich, Ryerson University

11:30-1:00 Session II: EMBEDDING

4. “Rationalization, Typification, Unification: New Strategies in the Planning of the Socialist City’ during the First Five-Year Plan (1928-1932,” Evgenia Konysheva, South Urals State University
5. “Citizen Kahn: Moritz and the Soviet Experience, 1929-39,” Claire Zimmerman, University of Michigan
6. “African-amerikanizm and Soviet Anti-Racism: Detroit Worker Robert Robinson in the USSR,” Christina Kiaer, Northwestern University

2:00 - 4:00 Session III: ADJUSTING

7. “People Making Things, Things Making People: Americanism in Soviet Genre Cinema, 1927,” Robert Bird, University of Chicago
8. “’The searchlight of exact and impartial investigation:’ Soviet memoirs of American technical consultants,” Christina Crawford, Emory University
9. “On the Line: Workers in the linear city,” Robert Fishman, University of Michigan
10. “’To Eradicate the Vestiges’: Ivan Nikolaev and the Reconstruction of Soviet Factories, 1933-1938,” Maria Taylor, University of Washington

Break 4:00-4:30

4:30 Closing discussion

Howard Brick, University of Michigan
Ron Suny, University of Michigan

Overview:
Between 1928 and 1932 several dozen American architects and engineers, most of them affiliated with Albert Kahn Associates, migrated from Detroit to Moscow to build the industrial campuses that modernized the Soviet Union. They set in motion over 500 construction projects, and trained over 300 Soviet designers, technicians, and draftsmen in American methods of design and implementation. During the very years in which architects from Detroit helped build Soviet factories, in notable cases with prefabricated components imported from the US, urban theories on linear city morphology as a fitting mode for industrialization blossomed in the USSR. English-language publications such as USSR in Construction featured compelling images of these monumental achievements, depicting Soviet progress in culture as well as technology. “Soviet Detroit,” as the industrial capital Nizhny-Novgorod would be called, was only one of many America-inspired cities developed during the first Five-Year Plan, which also included “Sibirsky Chicago” (Novosibirsk) and “Soviet Gary” (Magnitogorsk).

By the end of 1932, most of the American experts had returned, both to Detroit and to sites spread across the country. Over the four years of their stay, American journalists had celebrated their work on a regular basis. As the US economy recovered from the Great Depression and moved inexorably toward war, a small number of architects and engineers who participated in Soviet industrialization performed comparable tasks back in the United States. Linear urbanism grew up around American metropolises, particularly in the Midwest, in new communities such as Livonia, Michigan, strung alongside massive new factory complexes. The impact of Soviet urbanism on these communities remains to be assessed.

Moscow x Detroit: Transnational Modernity in the Built Environment will bring together distinguished historians of art, architecture, urbanism, and social history, to consider a critical moment in twentieth-century history, one that ramifies outward from the late 1920s to ripple through the later industrialization of the US and the USSR, affecting culture and the built environment for decades after. Its focus will be transnational exchange in both directions (initially toward the USSR, but also back to the USA), infrastructure development, and the impact of built environments (factories, housing, green zones) on cities built to serve industry, but surviving long after its evacuation. Participants, including specialists in both the American and the Soviet situation, will consider specific spatial questions, as well as broader analyses of the hidden effects of the “second Industrial Revolution” on culture, social organization, and the built environment on two continents.

Only recently has the complex of industrial developments that unfolded between Moscow and Detroit begun to receive notice in architectural and urbanistic scholarship. Groundbreaking research has focused new attention on the larger ramifications of this massive transfer of knowledge in both directions. Looking further into these developments, Moscow x Detroit is scheduled to coincide with the opening of an exhibition at The Canadian Centre for Architecture, Amerikanizm: Russian Architecture in Search of a New New World, that opens in Fall 2019 (curator: Jean-Louis Cohen).

Organizers:
Department of the History of Art, University of Michigan in coordination with The Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montreal

Claire Zimmerman, University of Michigan
Christina Crawford, Emory University
Jean-Louis Cohen, Institute of Fine Arts, New York University

Crazy prize-winning success from Modern Architecture final papers (Fall 2018)

Huge congratulations to my stellar students from ARTHIST 275: Modern Architecture, Fall 2018. An unprecedented three final comparison papers from that course by Olivia Chang (International Studies major, Art History minor / senior); Bethany Greene (Economics major, Architectural Studies minor / junior); and Jennifer Wang (Neuroscience & Behavioral Biology Major, Architectural Studies minor / junior) won Emory College, Emory University Libraries, and Art History Department prizes. I couldn’t be prouder of the research and analytical work they undertook to produce such justifiably heralded essays. Congrats, Olivia, Bethany, and Jen! See their topics below:

  • Olivia Chang, “In Search of Modern Classicism: The Shared Inspiration of Atlanta Freemasons and Hitler’s Third Reich,” paper for Modern Architecture course, winner of Dorothy Fletcher Paper Prize ($150), 2019

  • Bethany Greene, “An Unexpected Pairing: The Villa Muller and Cannon Chapel,” paper for Modern Architecture course, honorable mention for Alan Rackoff Prize for Undergraduate Research ($500), 2019

  • Jennifer Wang, “Cities Within Cities: A comparison of Rockefeller Center and Peachtree Center,” paper for Modern Architecture course, winner of Elizabeth Long Atwood Undergraduate Research Award ($500), 2019

Book launch / seminar for Routledge Research Companion to Landscape Architecture @ MIT Friday, December 7.

Come enjoy a seminar, discussion and drinks reception in celebration of the newly published volume, Routledge Research Companion to Landscape Architecture. I’ll give a short presentation of my chapter, “The Case to Save Socialist Space: Soviet Residential Landscapes Under Threat of Extinction,” which considers typical mass housing complexes constructed by the Soviet state in the 1920s and 1930s, and post-1950—communities designed to meet residents’ housing, educational, cultural, commercial, and recreational needs in all-inclusive precincts. The remarkable eighty-per-cent-open site plans that these complexes proffered signalled the presence of a fully socialist land regime in which land held no monetary value. Now, more than twenty-five years after the fall of the Soviet Union, this exterior collective space that was a hallmark of Soviet socialist housing provision is under threat of extinction. In the spring of 2017, the Russian State government took up a bill to demolish nearly 8,000 ‘decrepit’ Moscow residential buildings in order to parcelize and sell the capacious landscape in which they sit on the open real estate market. The chapter makes an argument for the unique qualities of these disappearing residential landscapes by articulating what so-called socialist space is, how it operates, what makes it worth preserving, and in conclusion offers options for approaching these fleeting remnants of a past economic regime. Join us for the celebration at MIT!

RESEARCH COMPANION TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECURE_Symposium Flyer_12-2018.jpg

"Socialist Settlement Experiment" wins Anthony Sutcliffe Award, Runner-up Prize, 2018

The Anthony Sutcliffe Award from the International Planning History Society recognizes the best dissertation in the field of planning history written in English and completed during the two years preceding the conference. There is no restriction on topic, but submissions that most directly and innovatively address the internationalism of the modern planning movement in line with much of Sutcliffe’s work are especially welcome.

Runner-up prize of the Anthony Sutcliffe Dissertation Award: Christina E. Crawford, "The Socialist Settlement Experiment: Soviet Urban Praxis. 1917-1932". 2016. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

"This dissertation is a very detailed and deeply researched submission, opening up fields seldom explored by the academy so far. The focus on  non-official Soviet planning and design experimentation is surprising and provocative, and the work on Ernst May and other actors of the time is magnificent. There is also an incredible work of compiling documents from archives in Azerbaijan, Canada, Russia, and the US, and a deep reflection on the role of architecture and city planning in the USSR. The number of new windows opened up is absolutely impressive." 

On behalf of The Anthony Sutcliffe Dissertation Award Committee: José Luis Sáinz Guerra, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain (Chair);   Nancy H. Kwak, UC San Diego, USA;   Karl Friedhelm Fischer, University of New South Wales, Australia. 

MASTERING THE ARCHIVE DESIGNATED "COOL COURSE"

My Spring 2018 graduate seminar, "Mastering the Archive: Situating Atlanta in the Interwar Housing Debates" was highlighted as a cool course in the Emory Report. The seminar focuses on my new home of Atlanta, the site of the first “slum clearance” project in the United States, in 1934, and America's first completed — though segregated — federally-funded public housing: Techwood and University Homes. Using these projects for research, students gain facility working in Atlanta-area archives through theoretical and historical readings and discussions and hands-on work and workshops with archival specialists. The seminar seeks to plot Atlanta on the interwar architectural map, establishing the city’s role as a clearinghouse for European social housing ideas in the U.S., and as the earliest homegrown precedent for the Roosevelt administration’s New Deal public housing. The students come from Art History, History, and even Emory's Goizueta Business School. It promises to be an intense semester; I'll report back on the results through my Research page.

NAMED SHERA EMERGING SCHOLAR, 2017

My article, “From Tractors to Territory: Socialist Urbanization through Standardization” in the Journal of Urban History, was selected as the inaugural winner of the 2017 Emerging Scholar Prize, Society of Historians of East European, Eurasian, and Russian Art and Architecture (SHERA). Thank you to SHERA, and the award jury, for recognizing my scholarship, and for this fantastic opportunity to have my work more widely read. Please email me if you'd like a copy, and do not have institutional access to the SAGE database.

FREE FREEDOM SQUARE!

The phenomenal (in scale and design) Freedom Square in Kharkiv, Ukraine--established in the 1920s--is under threat of serious kitschification. Please consider adding your name to this open letter to Ukrainian President of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko. To add your signature to the open letter please send your request to: orysia2011@gmail.com

An excerpt of the letter is posted below:

"When the monument to Lenin was taken down on the Freedom Square in September 2014, the question arose: how to rethink and redesign the square, a place highly significant for Kharkiv's visual image, a world-famous monument of the 1920s and 1930s architecture and urban planning?...

"On November 2, 2016, the Kharkiv city council announced a 'blitz open competition' for a new monument to be situated on Freedom Square. This competition violated the law in several ways: it was announced as charitable (the winner would not receive a prize), the type of competition was not specified (even though the character of the place calls for an international competition and an international expert jury), and the competition's call for submissions contained neither the essence of the problem to be resolved, nor the criteria by which submissions would be judged. There were no public hearings regarding the fate of this place. Just three months later, on February 3, 2017, the winning submission was announced: an 86-meter decorative column, topped by an angel with a cross, which crudely destroys the unified historical appearance of the square. This winning project has countless analogues in the world while its originality and artistic value are doubtful, to say the least. Kharkiv city residents have already called the project 'odoroblo,' which in Ukrainian means 'a monster.'" ...

GEORGIA TECH FINAL ARCHITECTURE REVIEWS

I'm pleased to participate as a design juror on final reviews at Georgia Tech School of Architecture. Former Harvard GSD classmate, Jen Pindyck, has been guiding her 2nd year MArch students in their analysis of, and intervention in, Clarkston, GA. Clarkston, just east of downtown Atlanta, became a Federal Refugee Resettlement Area in the 1908s, and is now known as the most diverse square mile in the United States. At the midterm, students pitched architectural, landscape, and inventive programming ideas to bolster the existing community and draw visitors to the city. I look forward to seeing what the second half of the semester brought. 

Magnitogorsk Modern at ASEEES

At the upcoming 2016 ASEEES Convention (Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies) I'll be presenting the paper, "Designing Steel City: All-Union Architectural/Competition for the City of Magnitogorsk, 1929-30," in the panel on Modernism in Soviet Architecture of the 1920s-1930s: Experiments and Myth-Making. Wake up early, and come hear three great presentations! Date/Time/Location: Sat, November 19, 8:00 to 9:45am, Wardman DC Marriott, Mezzanine, Johnson.

LANDSCAPES OF HOUSING at Harvard

I am happy to be participating in the Landscapes of Housing Mellon Colloquium, Harvard University, Friday, October 14, 2016. I'll be giving a talk entitled "Afterlife of a Model Socialist Settlement" on the panel, Housing, Landscape and the Post-Socialist City, which asks how socialist residential landscapes have fared in the 25 years since the fall of the Soviet Union. It promises to be an intellectually stimulating day, with presentations by practitioners and scholars that will explore the relationship of landscape and housing worldwide.